issue of YAHSHUA'S WITNESS MAGAZINE
was published for April-June-2016
Return to Magazines INDEX
Inside this issue:
FROM THE EIDITOR
Healan, Jerry Healan, Jerry Osborne
FROM THE EDITOR
WOW! CONFUSION (BABYLON) EVERYWHERE
Have you noticed it? Confusion is breaking out
everywhere. The Muslim insurgents in Europe are causing chaos and confusion
there. The illegals crossing the U.S. borders are creating confusion here along
with the infusion of Muslims. The presidential election is creating confusion.
It is also obvious that the leaders of this country are out of step with the
people, their constituents.
The administration that promised change, has done just that. Now there is
confusion as to what a real marriage is, and confusion as to when life really
begins. Have you seen any of the TV programs that go out and question people
about history? So many of our people, especially the young, and college
students, who are in school, are absolutely ignorant about some of the most
important events that have shaped this nation, this world, and the lives that
they are living in this world today! Their focus is only on the rich and famous
television, movie, music, and sports stars. Ask them important questions of
history and they are completely ignorant, but ask them questions about what is
going on with the stars and they know every detail about them.
Federal schooling system, which takes our tax money and then doles it out to the
public schooling system, and then controls what is being taught, is truly
revealed to be in the process of dumbing our people down. So many of our
children go through 12 years of schooling and are graduated not even able to
properly read, write, or even do simple arithmetic. This is a great travesty!
Yahweh says, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast
rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me:
seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy Elohim, I will also forget thy
children,” Hos. 4:6.
This gets us to your favorite church and minister. The Christian churches
and ministers (for the most part) teach that the law is done away. So neither
the people nor the ministers know who the real Savior is! They don’t observe
Yahweh’s Sabbaths and annual Holy Days, so they really can’t tell you the
plan of salvation, or what Yahweh is really doing. They need to enjoy their
tenure as priests and ministers now, because Yahweh declares that they will be
no priest to Him because of their forsaking of His law, which is not just the
commandments, but the whole Torah (first five books of Scripture).
Listen everyone! Your scientists will teach you about the physical laws
that govern the existence of the heavens and earth. They will tell you that
there are laws of physics, aerodynamics, chemistry, mathematics, biology, etc.,
but they will never tell you of the spiritual laws that exist because they are
in denial of our most wondrous and great Creator. Without law, there is nothing
but chaos, confusion, destruction, death, nothingness. The physical laws are
only a direct result of the spiritual laws that have existed eternally. Paul
admits that Yahweh’s law is holy, just, good, and spiritual (Ro. 7:12, 14).
The forsaking of Yahweh’s righteous spiritual law has caused the world
to descend into the abyss of chaos and confusion. People are readily and quick
to destroy their own lives and the lives of others through their disregard of
their Creator, and His Torah which includes His commands, statutes, and
judgments. Man knows that his societies can’t exist without laws to control
the people and bring about some kind of orderliness. But man’s laws are also
contradicting and confusing so much of the time. In America, the laws have been
made to oppress, and extort from the masses while the huge rich corporations
receive the real liberty spoken of concerning this country. The laws are being
tailor made for the corporations at the expense of the people.
This is nothing new. James declares, “Do not rich men oppress you, and
draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by
the which ye are called?” Jas. 1:6-7. He also warns, “Go to now, ye rich
men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are
corrupted, and your garments are motheaten. Your gold and silver is cankered;
and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as
it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days. Behold, the
hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept
back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into
the ears of Yahweh of sabaoth. Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been
wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye have
condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you,” Jas. 5:1-6.
We can certainly see these things taking place right in front of our
eyes. The middle class in this country is quickly shrinking and disappearing
while the rich wax greater and richer with each passing day and the poor are
doled out their meager portion from the hand of the so-called great rich
philanthropists. That is, through
the government programs that they force the middle class, through extortion, to
However, James also leaves words of comfort for Yahweh’s people as he
writes, “Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Master.
Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath
long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain,” Jas. 5:7.
BACK TO THE TOP
year, of course, is a national election year. I have seen many discussions by
believers as to who they support for the presidency. I have been in some heated
discussions with some of the brethren, even leaders of assemblies who
persistently encourage voting. Should we be taking part in voting for the
leaders of this nation?
There was a picture posted on my Facebook wall presenting Ted Cruz and
Donald Trump. It was focusing on their views of the Constitution (see picture).
The message was one in support of Ted Cruz because of his supposed support of
the Constitution. It came from one of the assembly leaders. I replied that we
are strangers and pilgrims on this earth (Heb. 11:13), and shouldn’t be
participating in the world’s election systems because that has to do with
spiritual fornication. (Rev. 17:1-5)
The brother wrote back wanting me to consider Joseph, Daniel, Hananiah,
Azariah, and Mischael.
Then I received another message from another brother who was encouraging
me to consider any of the Republican candidates who would be far better than
I responded…., Here
we are at the end of the age where the Scriptures reveal that the Mediterranean
Beast power is ruling and reigning and those who are supposed to be only
strangers and pilgrims as far as this world and its government, and this life is
concerned, and we want to involve ourselves in the political system? The choice
belongs to Yahweh not man. They are all men who have not the Spirit of Yahweh,
so what do you think you are going to get? Only more of the same until the stone
from heaven formed without hands intervenes to destroy man's perverted and
corrupted systems and introduce the kingdom of heaven to the world and the
seventh millennial reign. Shame on those who claim to be followers of the
Messiah who want to get involved in the world’s political systems.
He answered…, “Yes,
like Daniel, Azariah, Hannaniah, Mishael, Queen Easter, and Mordacai with the
Maccabbees as our example with Paul having his Roman citizenship to testify
before the rulers of his day to the death, burial, and resurrection. If all the
apolitical sects of the Christian faith had been involved in all aspects of the
political arena we would not be where we are at today in America but would be
smoothing the pavement for the Kingdom to come on the earth. The sin of omission
will have many apolitical preacher against voting or holding office answering
for not putting his faith to work by using the tools he had to effect righteous
change like these ancient witnesses did in beast governments.”
Okay, so I received an almost carbon copy answer from this man. So, I was
considering, let’s see….what political party were these ancient patriarchs a
part of? How did they run their campaign for office? Who were their campaign
managers, and who were their supporters?
While it is true that these patriarchs became important to the
governments of their day that is only because Yahweh was intervening with His
chosen agents to save the day for others and to bring about His purposes on the
earth. Joseph was raised up to not only save the world from the great dirge that
was coming upon the world at that time, but also to save the family that Yahweh
was working through to bring about His plan of salvation for the earth.
Daniel, Hananiah, Azariah, and Mischel were raised up after the demise of
Israel and Judah in order to continue to show the world that even though Israel
and Judah had been destroyed and removed from the land, the hope for the coming
of the Messiah was still alive and would continue to be working throughout those
nation’s history until the end of the age when the kingdom of heaven would be
Daniel and the later prophets of Ezra and Nehemiah’s day were raised up
to reveal the fulfillment of the raising up of the second temple, the coming of
the Messiah, and the great falling away to great perversion, and corruption in
the fourth and final kingdom before the age of the millennial kingdom will be
established to rule.
Yahshua charged His disciples to go throughout the world and to announce
to them that He, the king of the kingdom, had come and would return to establish
that kingdom of heaven, “And Yahshua came and spake unto them, saying, All
power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Spirit: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amein,”
“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the
evangel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but
he that believeth not shall be damned,” Mk. 16:15-16.
One of the assembly leaders was encouraging the brethren to get involved
in the political processes at a conference when another stood up encouraging the
assembly elders and leaders to get together, pray and fast seeking to work
together to go and announce the coming kingdom of heaven and the appearance of
Yahshua. The leader disagreed encouraging political involvement.
So the question is, “Have the purposes of Yahshua’s people, His
disciples changed?” Should Yahshua’s people get involved with the world and
its political systems?”
What does Yahweh’s word say about our leaders? “Thy princes are
rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth
after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the
widow come unto them,” Isa. 1:23.
This is speaking of Ancient Israel and Judah, the people who made the
covenant with Yahweh through Moses. Has anything changed? Can we expect anyone
who opposes Yahweh and His word, as we see taking place among our leaders and
this nation at large, to be any different from the leaders of Israel?
Notice that they love gifts (bribes) and have their hands out for rewards
(more bribery, how about the lobbying system?).
How do our current leaders judge the fatherless and widows? By forcing
others to take care of them, while very few of them donate to the social system
or even charities. And the ones who are more in favor of the social system,
forcing others to contribute, are very stingy and non-charitable.
Micah is even more critical, “And I said, Hear, I pray you, O heads of
Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel; Is it not for you to know
judgment? Who hate the good, and love the evil; who pluck off their skin from
off them, and their flesh from off their bones; Who also eat the flesh of my
people, and flay their skin from off them; and they break their bones, and chop
them in pieces, as for the pot, and as flesh within the caldron,” Mic. 3:1-3.
Zephaniah adds, “Woe to her that is filthy and polluted, to the
oppressing city! She obeyed not the voice; she received not correction; she
trusted not in Yahweh; she drew not near to her Elohim. Her princes within her
are roaring lions; her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones till
the morrow. Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: her priests have
polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law. The just Yahweh is
in the midst thereof; he will not do iniquity: every morning doth he bring his
judgment to light, he faileth not; but the unjust knoweth no shame,” Zeph.
Both Micah and Zephaniah are in agreement with Psalms 2:1-3, “Why do
the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth
set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against Yahweh, and
against his anointed (Messiah), saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and
cast away their cords from us.”
Everyone desires to get back to the Constitutional government, but that
is an impossible thing. In reality, the Constitution was suspended during
Abraham Lincoln’s administration. Then in 1913 Woodrow Wilson, along with both
houses of congress, gave away the right for the American government to print its
Things seemed pretty good until the administration of Franklin D.
Roosevelt when the Great Depression was created to bring about a New Deal
wherein the whole country was declared to be bankrupt and went into the hands of
the receivers (the international bankers who were printing the money out of thin
air and then loaning it to the government at interest).
Isn’t it interesting that right after 1913 a World War was fought?
Didn’t America and much of the rest of the world enter into that
conflagration? Where did the money to finance the war come from? The
international bankers! In fact, the bankers brag that they financed both sides!
They also financed both sides of World War II! None of those debts have
been repaid, only a portion of the interest on the debt is paid each year. Thus,
the debt continues to increase and the interest on the debt is also increasing
The Constitution was a compact drawn up by men. It was based on the mind
of man and man’s way of thinking. While it may have been the best contract
that man could have thought up and made, the fact of the matter is that the most
important pact or covenant is the one that Yahweh makes with us through Yahshua
Ever since Adam and Eve, man has taken the power to determine for himself
what is good and what is evil. Man has established his own laws and covenants.
Man has proven that he is a lawless being and that he can’t even abide by and
keep his own laws and covenants.
The Constitution was not made with Yahweh, it was a covenant made up by
men, for men, and between men. Therefore the Constitution is, in effect, a
worthless piece of paper.
Do we not understand our own nature? Don’t we understand that there is
a law of sin in the flesh which causes us to not be able to do the right things
that we would desire to do, but rather do the wrong that we determine not to do?
shall we say then? Is the law sin? Yahweh forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but
by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not
sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of
concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. 9For
I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived,
and I died. 10And
the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. 11For
sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. 12Wherefore
the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. 13Was
then that which is good made death unto me? Yahweh forbid. But sin,
that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by
the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
we know that the law is spiritual: but I
am carnal, sold under sin.
that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate,
that do I.
then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. 17Now
it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 18For
I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is
present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. 19For
the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. 20Now
if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in
find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. 22For
I delight in the law of Yahweh after the inward man: 23But
I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and
bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?”
The book of Romans was written around twenty years after his conversion.
He, who had been a Pharisee and according to the law, blameless (Phil. 3:6) was
now writing about an intense struggle that he was daily having with his flesh.
He wrote, “For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against
the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the
things that ye would,” Gal. 5:17.
Again, he writes, “5For
they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are
after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. 6
For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and
the carnal mind is enmity against Yahweh: for it is not subject to the law of
Yahweh, neither indeed can be. 8So
then they that are in the flesh cannot please Yahweh. 9But
ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of Yahweh
dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of the Messiah, he is none of
his,” Ro. 8:5-9.
Do any of the men, and women who are running for office have the Spirit
of Yahweh? Do they call upon His name? They do not have the Spirit of the
Messiah, they are none of His.
OF THE WORLD
The Apostle John writes, “15Love
not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the
world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16For
all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and
the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17And
the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of
Yahweh abideth for ever. 18Little
children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antimessiah shall come,
even now are there many antimessiahs; whereby we know that it is the last
time,” 1 Jn. 2:15-18.
Barack Hussein Obama was elected by the people (chosen by the shadow
government) on “Hope and Change.”
Remember that he presented himself as one who was in favor of family, in
favor of marriage being between a man and a woman, against homosexuality,
against the soaring national debt of 4 trillion dollars during the Bush years,
and many other things.
The master of deceit was definitely working in the man and look where he
and his cohorts have taken this nation.
But why did there need to be a change? Because the people saw that the
good old white boy network was taking us down a primrose path to destruction.
What did Mr. “Hope and Change” get this nation? Not only more of the same,
but the path to destruction is now on a much, much faster track!
So what are the new good old white boys and/or gals going to do? There
may be a slight shift here or there, but the fast track to destruction has been
set. The seeds of destruction were sown in the flesh long ago by Adam and Eve (Chavvah).
We are at the final stages when that corruption to destruction gains much more
After all, Yahshua did say, speaking of the last days; “For then shall
be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this
time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there
should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be
shortened,” Mt. 24:21-22.
Albert Pike, a 33°
Freemason and Supreme Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction, wrote a letter
declaring that there would be three world wars, and by the end of the third war,
people would be anxious to give in to Lucifer, “The
war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and
political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile
the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight
to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We
shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable
social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the
effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world
minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization,
multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that
moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without
knowing where to render its adoration,
will receive the
true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer,
brought finally out in the public view.
This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will
follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and
exterminated at the same time.”
of letter excerpt)
With all of the advance in technology and the most terrifying of
weaponry, World War III will be an extremely costly, disastrous and deadly war.
Didn’t Yahshua say that He would have to shorten the days or no flesh
should be saved?
Who would the worshippers of Lucifer really be? Who profits off of war?
The Scriptures reveal that Esau would live by his sword, “And by thy sword
shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when
thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy
neck,” Gen. 27:40.
What was Esau’s inheritance to be? “Meddle not with them; for I will
not give you of their land, no, not so much as a foot breadth; because I
have given mount Seir unto Esau for a possession,”
“Seir” means, shaggy; as noun, a he-goat; by analogy, a faun, devil,
goat, hairy, kid, rough, satyr (Strong’s
Jacob’s inheritance was to be Yahweh. Since Esau despised his
inheritance, which was originally Yahweh and His kingdom, he was assigned the
kingdom of Seir (the
Remember Yahshua’s temptation in the wilderness, “5And
the devil (ha-seir),
taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all
the kingdoms of the world
in a moment of time. 6And
the devil (ha-seir)
said unto him, All
this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that
is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine,” Lk. 4:5-7.
If such was true in that day, should we think that anything has changed,
or is different in this world today? Doesn’t the book of Revelation reveal a
great beast system? “1And
I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having
seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the
name of blasphemy. 2And
the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of
a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power,
and his seat, and great authority. 3And
I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was
healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. 4And
they worshipped the dragon
which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is
like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” Rev. 13:1-4.
Who is the dragon? “And the great dragon
was cast out, that
old serpent, called the Devil (ha-Seir),
which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels
were cast out with him,” Rev. 12:9.
“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my
people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her
plagues,” Rev. 18:4.
Yes!!!!! Come out of her. Remove yourself from being swayed to and fro by
her deceitful leaders. The final two stages of Babylon were to be Greece (brass,
democracy) and Rome (iron, republic). America has been deceived by her Jewish,
Edomite, European masters to partake of both systems.
Come out of the deceit of their master Lucifer, Satan, the Devil! Embrace
the good news of the kingdom of heaven that is soon to be established by our
great returning Savior. Let’s do the work of proclaiming the only hope for
this world which is His sudden intervention to halt our lemming-like rush to the
cliff of destruction!
TO THE TOP
of our brothers has done some research into the process by which the so-called
nation named the United States of America has been deceptively manipulated. Now
it comes out that for a person to vote in the upcoming election is an act of
treason against one’s own nation (called a state). You may not understand what
is being said here, but that is the purpose of the attorneys and lawyers to
utilize language that is not readily understood by the common people. As the
Scriptures reveal, “...that old serpent called the devil and Satan has
deceived the whole world,” Rev. 12:9. The fact of the matter is that the
rulers and kings of the earth have always known how to manipulate their people
to commit fornication with the harlot and beast (Rev. 17:1-5, Psa. 2:1-3). This
article, coupled with the previous one (Should We Vote?), should open our eyes
to how treasonous it is to vote in a deceptive national election against one’s
own country (state), much less the treason that would be committed by those
whose citizenship is in heaven. JH
YOU A TRAITOR?
few weeks ago I ran a post attempting to explain that voting was in fact treason
by design, and that we who are not supposed to hold hands with this world,
should have nothing to do with this fake corrupt system to begin with. Several
so called “believers” unfriended me over this, wanting to go on along 'galavanting'
to the polls, and yet others had never heard of such a “conspiracy.”
article will determine whether or not you are a traitor to your country. By the
time you finish reading it you will be in total shock, as most people
unwittingly are deemed traitors. Now here is the most shocking and
unconscionable fact: IT IS A CRIME TO VOTE!
are probably dumbfounded because this sounds like lunacy; however, IT IS TRUE!
READ THIS ON ‘ISSUU’ CLICK HERE: ( http://issuu.com/therootbearsyou/docs/treason_by_design)
BY DESIGN © Authored by LB Bork firstname.lastname@example.org
true evil behind the 14th Amendment
has been said that ignorance is bliss... That may be true, but it may also be
criminal... I dedicate this thesis to all the people who vote and partake of the
system of government under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, for it is
they who have destroyed America. —LB Bork
I happened upon a treatise by Lysander Spooner entitled, “No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority”, in the mid-December, 1999. This particular article was forwarded to me by an acquaintance in the freedom movement. Spooner was a brilliant attorney from the country of Massachusetts who spoke out gallantly against “The State”. While the title of this particular work of Lysander Spooner was intriguing enough, I was floored by its issues.
set premise: the reason this particular treatise set me on end is that Mr.
Spooner had the exact same sentiments about the purpose of the Civil War which I
have come to discern. Accordingly, for the past year I have been researching the
Fourteenth Amendment — that is fallout from the so-called Civil War — and
its bastard effects. In my researched opinion, this amendment is so evil it
would go beyond the comprehension of many. I had found most people in the
movement only scrutinize Section 1, wherein the issue of citizenship and due
process is established; however, the true evil lies within the other sections.
In the opinion of this jurist, the most evil is Section 2. This particular
section deals with the [re]apportionment of the so-called “inhabitants” for
representation and also sets forth voter stipulations.
we delve into this evil, it would be most beneficial to read the final excerpts
from the last chapter of the writing of Lysander Spooner entitled: No Treason.
For your legal and historical enlightenment behold the following perceived
wisdom from Mr. Spooner....
TREASON, by Lysander Spooner
are the terms on which alone this government, or, with few exceptions, any
other, ever gives “peace” to its people.
whole affair, on the part of those who furnished the money, has been, and now
is, a deliberate scheme of robbery and murder; (Undoubtedly a reference to
General Ulysses S. Grant, who had just become President.) not merely to
monopolize the markets of the South, but also to monopolize the currency, and
thus control the industry and trade, and thus plunder and enslave the laborers,
of both North and South. And Congress and the president are today the merest
tools for these purposes. They are obliged to be, for they know that their own
power, as rulers, so-called, is at an end, the moment their credit with the
blood-money loan-mongers fails. They are like a bankruptcy in the hands of an
extortioner. They dare not say nay to any demand made upon them. And to hide at
once, if possible, both their servility and their crimes, they attempt to divert
public attention, by crying out that they have “Abolished Slavery!” That
they have “Saved the Country!” That they have “Preserved our Glorious
Union!” and that, in now paying the “National Debt,” as they call it (as
if the people themselves, all of them who are to be taxed for its payment, had
really and voluntarily joined in contracting it), they are simply “maintaining
the National Honor!”
“maintaining the national honor,” they mean simply that they themselves,
open robbers and murderers, assume to be the nation, and will keep faith with
those who lend them the money necessary to enable them to crush the great body
of the people under their feet; and will faithfully appropriate, from the
proceeds of their future robberies and murders, enough to pay all their loans,
principal and interest.
pretense that the “abolition of slavery” was either a motive or
justification for the war, is a fraud of the same character with that of
“maintaining the national honor.” Who, but such usurpers, robbers, and
murderers as they, ever established slavery? Or what government, except one
resting upon the sword, like the one we now have, was ever capable of
maintaining slavery? And why did these men abolish slavery? Not from any love of
liberty in general not as an act of justice to the black man himself, but only
“as a war measure,” and because they wanted his assistance, and that of his
friends, in carrying on the war they had undertaken for maintaining and
intensifying that political, commercial, and industrial slavery, to which they
have subjected the great body of the people, both white and black. And yet these
imposters now cry out that they have abolished the chattel slavery of the black
man although that was not the motive of the war-as if they thought they could
thereby conceal, atone for, or justify that other slavery which they were
fighting to perpetuate, and to render more rigorous and inexorable than it ever
was before. There was no difference of principle but only of degree between the
slavery they boast they have abolished, and the slavery they were fighting to
preserve; for all restraints upon men’s natural liberty, not necessary for the
simple maintenance of justice, are of the nature of slavery, and differ from
each other only in degree.
their object had really been to abolish slavery, or maintain liberty or justice
generally, they had only to say: All, whether white or black, who want the
protection of this government, shall have it; and all who do not want it, will
be left in peace, so long as they leave us in peace. Had they said this, slavery
would necessarily have been abolished at once; the war would have been saved;
and a thousand times nobler union than we have ever had would have been the
result. It would have been a voluntary union of free men; such a union as will
one day exist among all men, the world over, if the several nations, so called,
shall ever get rid of the usurpers, robbers, and murderers, called governments,
that now plunder, enslave, and destroy them.
another of the frauds of these men is, that they are now establishing, and that
the war was designed to establish, “a government of consent.” The only idea
they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this-that it
is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot. This idea was the dominant
one on which the war was carried on; and it is the dominant one, now that we
have got what is called peace.
pretenses that they have “Saved the Country,” and “Preserved our Glorious
Union,” are frauds like all the rest of their pre-tenses. By them they mean
simply that they have subjugated, and maintained their power over, an unwilling
people. This they call “Saving the Country”; as if an enslaved and
subjugated people or as if any people kept in subjection by the sword (as it is
in-tended that all of us shall be hereafter) could be said to have any country.
This, too, they call “Preserving our Glorious Union”; as if there could be
said to be any Union, glorious or inglorious, that was not voluntary. Or as if
there could be said to be any union between masters and slaves; between those
who conquer, and those who are subjugated.
these cries of having “abolished slavery,” of having “saved the
country,” of having “preserved the union,” of establishing “a government
of consent,” and of “maintaining the national honor,” are all gross,
shameless, transparent cheats-so transparent that they ought to deceive no
one-when uttered as justifications for the war, or for the government that has
succeeded the war, or for now compelling the people to pay the cost of the war,
or for compelling anybody to support a government that he does not want.
lesson taught by all these facts is this: As long as mankind continue to pay
“national debts,” so-called-that is, so long as they are such dupes and
cowards as to pay for being cheated, plundered, enslaved, and murdered-so long
there will be enough to lend the money for those purposes; and with that money a
plenty of tools, called soldiers, can be hired to keep them in subjection. But
when they refuse any longer to pay for being thus cheated, plundered, enslaved,
and murdered, they will cease to have cheats, and usurpers, and robbers, and
murderers and blood-money loan-mongers for masters. ” [ END SPOONER CLIP ]
most important thing to note is that Lysander Spooner established the sentiments
of “The Union” about “a government of consent” after the “Civil
War”. This is what astonished me about the piece: two weeks prior to receiving
it I completed an article based on my research on the Fourteenth Amendment
entitled: “Are You a Traitor?” This particular article covered two
encumbrances which stem from Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment:
Consent; 2) Treason.
the mind of this jurist, what Lysander Spooner’s treatise had done is totally
confirm all my research and my conclusions thereof. Below is the revealing
condensed article prepared to inform people in the movement. The article is of
tutorial nature... So you may have to review its content several times to have a
full understanding of the main point being made...
YOU A TRAITOR? By LB Bork / PAC
article will determine whether or not you are a traitor to your country. By the
time you finish reading it you will be in total shock, as most people
unwittingly are deemed traitors.
set the premise of the above notation, please view this segment from the
Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among
Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
ARE INSTITUTED AMONG MEN, DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE
look at this definition from Black’s Law Dictionary Deluxe, sixth edition:
CITIZENS. Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associated
capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a
government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of
their individual as well as collective rights.( U.S. v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542.)
a question is posed to you: What government have you consented-submitted to?
Well… the answer please? Here are two shocking facts:
“United States” is not your country as a matter of law!
“United States” is not your nation as a matter of law!
here is the most shocking and unconscionable fact: IT IS A CRIME TO VOTE!
are probably dumbfounded because this sounds like lunacy; however, IT IS TRUE!
it is explained how it is a crime to vote, you must understand why it is a crime
to vote. To assist in explaining this unconscionable truth, the following facts
— that are inherent in the United States Constitution — need to be verified
for you to understand.
prove the facts illustrated, definitions from Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856
edition) will generally be referenced. This particular law dictionary is chiefly
utilized due to it being pure in definitional nature. It has been found that
current law dictionaries have been altered — to some point — and/or are
vague in their definitions. If the source is different it shall be noted.
MAKEUP OF THE UNION
international and constitutional law, all states that are in the American union
— that are also referred to as republics — are separate sovereignties,
countries and nations. To assist in explaining this let us view the first set of
legal definitions which are as follows:
COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member; Every man’s
country is in general the state in which he happens to have been born.
NATIONS. Nations or states are independent bodies politic; societies of men
united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage
by the joint efforts of their combined strength... i.e., your
Lawful “nationality” defined — pursuant to international law— is:
NATIONALITY. The state of a person in relation to the nation in which he was
born... i.e., your state reflects your nationality, e.g., Iowan, Ohioan, etc.4
(Nation = Nationality. This can be changed; it is referred to as Expatriation.
See Title 8 USC § 1481; see also Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(23). Definitions. The
term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a
person after birth, by any means whatsoever. see also definitions of jus
sanguinis and jus soli, i.e., your native republic/country.)
you can plainly see, a country is a state, and a nation is somewhat synonymous
with state. All states (i.e., several states) of America make-up the “[U]nited
States of America” (Union) the incorporated unit makes-up the “United
States” (the ‘State’ of the Union).
this time, did you realize that the “United States” is not your nation?
Doubtful, as most of us have been educated in the governmental (public) school
system. Perhaps you are seeing some of the reasons why they do not teach law to
the children in school. (more SEE http://www.pacalliance.us/slave/
FROM LAWFUL TO UNLAWFUL
the above principles, the lawful system of government for the Union (under the
Constitution established by the founding fathers) has not been seen by any
American for over 140 years. Unknown to most Americans the main purpose of the
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was to create new citizens (United
States citizens). Moreover, people also do not realize that it also defines —
and sets-up — a usurpation governmental system. This system of government is
referred to as a de facto government, or a government de facto.
we further explain this unconscionable matter of conversion, you should
understand the general difference between de facto and de jure. The definitions
are as follows:
DE FACTO. In fact, as distinguished from “de jure,” by right, i.e., not
now for the lawful reference,
DE JURE. By right; by lawful right; rightfully; complying with the law in all
respects; valid in law, i.e., constitutional.
the above definitions are taken from the modern Black’s Law Dictionary, sixth
AMERICANS ARE DEEMED DE FACTO
infamous Fourteenth Amendment was instituted by a rump (RUMP, n. A legislature
having only a small part of its original membership and therefore being
unrepresentative or lacking in authority. American Heritage Dictionary )
congress on the date of June 13, 1866 and purportedly ratified July 9, 1868.
With that established, now let us look at the language that is found in Section
1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. It is as follows:
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein
people in the “freedom movement” believe the Fourteenth Amendment does not
affect them because they think they are not within the jurisdiction of the
“United States”, as they live in a State, or they are not of African
descent. Sorry, but this is incorrect. Everyone born within the jurisdiction of
the United States of America — i.e., in one of the several states — is
fundamentally naturalized by the Fourteenth Amendment at birth, except for
Indians.( However American aborigines can be United States citizens if they
want; and all other citizenship exceptions, see Title 8 USC § 1401 for such
exceptions. ) As to this fact, see this corresponding definition from Black’s
Law Dictionary, sixth edition:
NATURALIZATION CLAUSE. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution, Section 1, provides that all persons born or naturalized in the
United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States, and of the State wherein they reside.
“uniform rule of naturalization”( Article I, section 8, clause 4, expressly
gives Congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. ) clause
found in the body of the Constitution provides some broad power to fiddle with
whatever the United States wants in regard to the control of the peoples’
citizenship of the several states. Of course this takes affect through
“operations of law” with the people not even realizing it. The courts then
have the ability to toy with it. (OPERATION OF LAW. This term expresses the
manner in which rights, and sometimes liabilities, devolve upon a person by the
mere application to the particular transaction of the established rules of law,
without the act or cooperation of the party himself. —Black’s Law
Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe )
further illustrate: In 1884 in the case of Elk v Wilkins, ( Elk v Wilkins, 112
U.S. 94 (1884). A great 14th Amendment case to study and review.) the court
stated the following in reference to Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment and
its dual citizenship:
section contemplates two sources of citizenship and two sources only: birth and
naturalization. The persons declared to be citizens are “All persons born or
naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. The
evident meaning of these last words is, not merely subject in some respect or
degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their
political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance...”
last statement may sound familiar to you: “United States” Pledge...
Allegiance? (See how the Pledge of Allegiance brought about “national
socialism” here : www.pacinlaw.us/pledge)
Accordingly, a United States citizen owes allegiance to all the states. However,
one should ask: What is wrong with this picture? How can you have allegiance to
every state if they are all separate nations? A little investigation would show
that prior to the so-called “Civil War” the peoples of the several states
owed fidelity to their states, not the United States.
IN PROPER FORMAT
to make a point: As discussed above, we know that California and Nevada are
deemed nations under international law. Let us say that one nation attacked the
other; in other words, declared war on the other for some reason or another. If
you were a member of the nation of the Nevada republic — which you would have
direct allegiance to — how can you go to war against California which you also
have allegiance to? You cannot fight on two sides!
put, you can only have allegiance to one of the countries, your country: Nevada.
expand on this premise (as to above example because it is the same situation)
you may have heard that the Confederate Soldiers in the “Civil War” were
deemed rebels. This is not correct. In other words, in saying this is fraud, see
this documented authority:
REBELS. A term loosely but incorrectly applied to the Confederate Forces engaged
in the Civil War. 30 Am J Rev ed lnsurr § 2
There was no breach of allegiance to their nations (countries/state governments)
nor did any one of them commit treason against the Union to a foreign power! The
Confederate States had a war pursuant to international law. It was actually an
International War : A war between nations… the individual states. Courts
properly call it The War Between the States.
THE GENOCIDE BEGIN
are we seeing is actually the real purpose of the so-called “Civil War”:
Genocide. This is melding of many nations into one which essentially destroys
their ability to be sovereign. Accordingly, to further illustrate this farce see
this definition Title 8 USC § 1401:
following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) A
person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) A
person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or
other aboriginal tribe: Provided, that the granting of citizenship under this
subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such
person to tribal or other property. ( Subsection (b) is referencing Indians not
taxed. They are precluded from the jurisdiction.)
the above statutory reference states: “a person born in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof shall be a national and citizen of the
United States at birth.”
noted status is further defined by Title 8 USC § 1101(a) (22), definitions:
The term “national of the United States” means a citizen of the United
other words, a citizen of the United States is a national of the United States.
Pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment operations you have one “nationality”
only: United States nationality. Of course, this is repugnant to constitutional
law and the law of nations. But again, this was all in the hidden design of the
so-called “Civil War” as established by its orchestrators:
Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and
nationality.” (The Communist Manifesto, 1848 )
GOVERNMENT OF CONSENT
this brings us back to the original question posed:
government have you consented and/or submitted to?
according to the operations of the Fourteenth Amendment, you have submitted
yourself to the general jurisdiction of the federal government. This has been
accomplished through various operations of law, your silence, and also by overt
acts that you have done.
HERE IS THE UNCONSCIONABLE OVERT ACT! You may refer to it as the SET-UP!
is a fact that you have to be a ‘new’ citizen of the United States (federal
citizen) to vote in elections. You may verify that fact by searching your [S]tate
statutes regarding voting. Now, although it is hard to see — as the language
is intentionally written to confuse people — if you decipher Section 2 of the
Fourteenth Amendment, you will see that the de facto states or governments truly
only represent people who are voting, with others being put in a perilous
limbo-land. (See the detailed assessment on Section 2 of the 14th Amendment here
) Remember earlier in this article it was mentioned that it is a crime to vote.
Now we can take a look at how this is done. The pertinent text found in Section
2 of the Fourteenth Amendment illustrates to us that it is a crime to vote. This
is so evil it is beyond belief:
. .the right to vote at any election. . . is denied. . . except for
participation in rebellion, or other crime. . .”
Understand that you cannot create ‘new’ citizens of the United States (so-called ) without having to violate some constitutional principles and rules of international law. The lawful government(s) of the several states of the America union needed to be usurped. This is done by making voters unwittingly throw-off their allegiance to their lawful governments. The clause illustrated in Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment accomplishes this. By operations of law under the amendment, the “citizens” of the several states are made into criminals:
voting as a United States citizen — or citizen of the United States — you
join in the rebellion[s] noted in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment. When you vote
as such a person — or do not denounce the fraudulent United States citizenship
by proper process (Public Law; 15 US Statutes at Large, Chap. 249, pps 223-224
(1868); Title 8 USC § 1481.)— you are joined in rebellion against your
“constitutional state government”. You then give silent and paramount
allegiance to the insurgent governmental system over your (or a) lawful state
crime referenced is rebellion, hence is treason. Treason can be found mentioned
in the body of the Constitution under Article III, Section 3. It is defined as
TREASON. This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. The
constitution of the United States, art. 3, s. 3, defines treason against the
United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to
their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death.
further expand, insurgent and rebel are defined by Noah Webster (1828) as
INSURGENT. A person who rises in opposition to civil or political authority; one
who openly and actively resists the execution of laws. [See insurrection]
insurgent differs from a rebel. The insurgent opposes the execution of a
particular law or laws; a rebel attempts to overthrow or change government, or
he revolts and attempts to place his country under another authority. All rebels
are insurgents, but all insurgents are not rebels. It is asked of you, is this
not fitting? In addition, see this definition that further illustrates the
matter of rebellion against the lawful governments of the several states:
INSURRECTION. A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its
government. (see also: belligerent)
imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance; and, Insurrection is a
rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government with
purpose of turning their county over to another authority.
alternate governmental system that seated itself after the so-called “Civil
War” can be evidenced in Section 3 of the infamous amendment. This particular
section has also been very craftily executed: the insurgent Fourteenth Amendment
governmental system (For description of this government, see Black’s Law
Deluxe, 6th edition: government de facto.) has to uphold the organic
Constitution pursuant to other clauses in Section 3. This had to be done or the
de facto participants — i.e., the government officers — would be considered
to be in rebellion also. Wherefore, they are deemed “insurgents” for not
following some of the laws. It is the people voting that have turned over the
“political power” of their states (or countries) to the federal government.
Secretly, the ‘new’ voters are the true rebels in this orchestrated war!
registration is prima facie evidence of being in rebellion. In theory, two
people actually have to see a person vote — or the personal admission of the
voter — to fill the requirements for treason. But who is to truly enforce this
when the ones who have installed this plot (or bad joke) are the ones in
control. Undoubtedly, this is why voting is taught to be confidential, or by as
they call it secret ballot: voters are actually traitors to their countries. As
such voters and their cohorts — known as citizens of the United States —
have unwittingly tossed their constitutional governmental system aside they are
then treated as a public enemy and given privileges as the rebels they are. This
whole scenario nullifies natural rights as secured by the Constitution. The
lawful societal law, custom and usage law — the common law — is then
discharged. A system of “private law” has been put in its place. The
‘new’ citizens are now controlled by the United States and the state wherein
they reside. One could say that these self-inflicted de facto States are
actually penal colonies operating under the Color of War.
are you asking yourself: What does this all really mean?
are you asking the following: How can my rights be taken away? And, why do I
have to be involved in criminal activity or be associated with criminals? The
answer to the former is: They cannot. The answer to the latter is: You do not.
The factors surrounding this evil plan are that the lawful rights of people who
do not want to participate are preserved.
again, the sad truth is this is just a clever scheme to make you subject to both
the state and federal governments.17 However, the good news is the de facto
governments have to uphold the principles of the organic Constitution, hence
there is a congressional cure. See, study, and — most importantly —
understand Title 8 USC § 1481.14 When you complete that task you should
understand the following found in Title 8 of the United States Code:
The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United
let us reference this definition from Title 8 of the United States Code:
The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.19
. . Behold true constitutional freedom:
Title 18 USC § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law; (Criminal) [in
part]: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or
custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, or District to
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by
the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments,
pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien... shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
IS YOUR REPUBLICAN FREEDOM! 20 For one to be immune to deprivation of rights
done under color of law (i.e., private law) and have freedom under this
insurgent system of government installed by the infamous Fourteenth, one has to
BE AN ALIEN. 21 As you can see, having the citizen and national of the United
States status creates many hidden liabilities.
the question is: Have you unwittingly breached your allegiance to your native
you can clearly see, Mr. Spooner had insight on the planned servitude of our
American nations in his piece “No Treason”. Suitably he stated this about
the silent ballot:
quietly to all the robbery and slavery we have arranged for you, and you can
the instrumental blow came after the so-called Civil War. The conversion of
Americans’ lawful state citizenship and nationality — under international
law — has been slowly implemented not to draw attention. People in the
“freedom movement” have gone deep into the issue of “state” citizenship;
however, they have not found the true key. The appropriate index is NATIONALITY!
Remember, in Elk v Wilkins supra, the court had stated that a citizen of the
United States owes political allegiance to the “United States”. However,
inherent constitutional political allegiance is to your state. All other
governments are foreign (alien), including the United States.22 Thus, Americans
with proper status — nationals of the states — are ALIENS (as per law of the
United States). This legal premise existed under the organic Constitution, that
also regarded citizens to be “aliens” to sister states in the Union.
original constitutional premises, generally the federal government has nothing
to do with the American people. The Fourteenth Amendment establishes a new
constitution that runs concurrently with the original or organic Constitution.
All subsequent amendments are part of the bastard constitution and/or
“government of consent” under the Fourteenth. And if you have not guessed it
by now, the “Pledge of Allegiance” is brainwashing propaganda that was of
purpose to get all Americans to buy into the ‘One Nation Under Fraud’. The
herein noted material is a planned, extensive, progressive scheme that has been
contrived by words, disinformation, and designed ignorance. 23 There is only one
method to remove the Fourteenth Amendment noose from your neck. Such method is
congressionally conferred and is well hidden by design. It is ventured that most
“government servants” 24 do not know about it.
QUESTION IS: Who does know, and are they willing to fix it!?!
apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe... Our destruction, should
it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people
to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I
must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too
implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize
their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and
become the instruments of their own undoing. Make them intelligent, and they
will be vigilant; give them the means of detecting the wrong, and they will
apply the remedy.” ~Daniel Webster (circa 1848)
by LB Bork of the People’s Awareness Coalition. Additional credit given to
Gregory Williams, Joseph Rorie and John Ainsworth for their research. It has
provided insight in understanding some of the crucial details surrounding the
usurpation. Also see these articles on Section 2 of the 14th Amendment and the
The Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution as written: “Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place
subject to their jurisdiction.”
Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(3) of the definitions that define their use in Chapter
Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(21) of the definitions that define their use in Chapter
In early editions of this paper, “constitutional liberty” was used. It has
been replaced with “republican freedom” based on a statement by Justice
Black in the case of Adderley v. State of Florida (1967). Liberty or the term
referred to as “constitutional liberty” is freedom under civil law and is
actually attached to “civil rights”.
ALIEN. Owing political allegiance to another country or government; foreign.
alien residents. An unnaturalized foreign resident of a country; also called
noncitizen. American Heritage Dictionary. Important! The United States Code, and
accordingly the United States government, is for the most part foreign; the
federal government only has some matters of Public Law on such persons as
conferred by the Constitution.
TITLE 22. FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE. Title 22 USC § 2659. State
statutes to be procured. The Secretary of State shall procure from time to time
such of the statutes of the several States as may not be in his office, i.e.,
the states are foreign to the United States.
Higher education is telling your children that state sovereignty is a sickness :
See the assessment on who your “servants” really are here : www.pacinlaw.us/servants
TO THE TOP
Return to Magazines INDEX